[Openswan dev] [PATCH] Add NON-IKE support for 26sec
ken at xelerance.com
Wed Jun 2 05:12:02 CEST 2004
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Nate Carlson wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Ken Bantoft wrote:
> > I'd heard about this, but haven't had time to check out the latest SuSE
> > patches yet.
> > Thanks for the patch, it's in HEAD now, and I've put it in the 2.1.x
> > branch as well, incase we do another release from that branch.
> Note that this patch to Openswan breaks things on a stock 2.6 kernel
> without the SuSE patches, talking to a SFS 1.99 box - get the dreaded
> unhandled udp encap type error. Maybe need some logic to figure out if the
> SuSE patches are applied to the kernel or not?
Insert rant about vendor patched kernels here - they make our lives a
nightmare, and waste far too much of our time. Does the stock kernel suck
so much these days?
I guess I'll back it out for now, and we can see if the SuSE patch makes
it into the Linus kernels or something.
> It works fine with a 2.4.26 kernel with the backported 26sec support, and
> the SuSE patch applied.
> I also tried it on the same 2.4.26 kernel with KLIPS instead of 26sec (so
> KLIPS using the 26sec NAT-T patches with the SuSE patch); I do not receive
> a UDP Encaps error (like I previously did without the SuSE patch applied
> to the kernel), but traffic over the tunnel still doesn't work.
Ken Bantoft VP Business Development
ken at xelerance.com Xelerance Corporation
The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet.
-- William Gibson
More information about the Dev