Please read mailing list<br><br>Paul answered :<br><div class="im"><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote"><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">
Hi, therefore with kernel-2.6.27 (Fedora Core 10) for to use Openswan-2.6.22<br>
with klips and nat-t support (and xl2tp) isn't necessary applied nat-t patch<br>
and klips-patch ? and therefore isn't necessary recompile kernel ?<br></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">That is correct.<br></blockquote></div><br>Regards<br><br>Julien<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2009/7/1 Andraz Sraka <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:a@aufbix.org">a@aufbix.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
re<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 21:16 +1000, David McCullough wrote:<br>
> I'm not sure what you mean here, but with 2.6.22 you can run klips or<br>
> netkey (your choice) and do NAT-T or not all without patching your<br>
> kernel.<br>
><br>
> At least thats the theory :-)<br>
<br>
</div>can somebody confirm that theory? :)<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
regards,<br>
Andraz<br>
<br>
--<br>
Humppa all the way!<br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@openswan.org">Users@openswan.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:<br>
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155" target="_blank">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>