<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/10/11, Paul Wouters <<a href="mailto:paul@xelerance.com">paul@xelerance.com</a>>:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">The up1.txt log shows me that first of all NAT-T on this ipsec.conf<br>is disabled (which might cause the different behaviour), It then seems
<br>to stop after it has send its certificate, which is probably related to<br>the certificate/id setup?</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>the arm linux has NAT-T patch,but not enable, I want to ask that is it essential for openswan?</div>
<div>in my x86 linux,I also not enable NAT-T ,but it still connected to the remote server.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">- Are you using the IDENTICAL configuration files in /etc/ipsec.* on<br>the arm and the x86_64?</blockquote>
<div>yes, we only update ipsec.conf & ipsec.secrets files</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">- Are you using the IDENTICAL network plug and network location for<br>both tests?</blockquote>
<div>I use IP SHARE to assign my two test machine local ip address (192.168.1.**), they are different local ip address ! </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks for your response!</div>
<div> </div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">I have the idea that your setups might be different. Either a different<br>network or a different config file.
<br><br>Paul<br>--<br>Building and integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:<br><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>