<br>Thanks for the info. For some reason, googling didn't get me the answer.<br>I originally thought NAT-T itself can solve multiple IPsec clients behind the same NAT. But what I thought might be wrong.<br><br>Cheers,<br>
CK<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/29/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Paul Wouters</b> <<a href="mailto:paul@xelerance.com">paul@xelerance.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Jacco de Leeuw wrote:<br><br>> This is a known problem in Openswan:<br>> <a href="http://www.jacco2.dds.nl/networking/openswan-l2tp.html#NAT-multiple-clients">http://www.jacco2.dds.nl/networking/openswan-l2tp.html#NAT-multiple-clients
</a><br>><br>> Paul Wouters of the Openswan team mentioned something about an<br>> announcement but I have not seen it yet:<br>> <a href="http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2007-September/013069.html">http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2007-September/013069.html
</a><br><br>We are working on integrating the patch into the mainstream openswan-2.5 tree,<br>but we are currently swamped with work :(<br><br>Paul<br>_______________________________________________<br><a href="mailto:Users@openswan.org">
Users@openswan.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users">http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:<br><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155">
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155</a><br></blockquote></div><br>