<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Lolzz....<br>
<br>
yeah i read about your discussion once!<br>
Personally i felt ssh tunnels are easier to configure and secure as
well.<br>
I am saying this coz i am new to ipsec. Probably if someone would
debate over it and prove me that ipsec was really better.<br>
As of now i am happy that Cisco-Openswan worked for me. :D<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Thanks and Best regards
Atul Chaudhari
Systems and Database Adminstrator
</pre>
<br>
<br>
Jacco de Leeuw wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid46F8E8DB.7090903@dds.nl" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Ruben Laban wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The other end changed the DH group to 2 from 1 and it worked!!!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Don't you mean from DH group 1 to 2? Group 1 was the insecure one
(768 bits).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">AFAIK 'to 2 from 1' and 'from 1 to 2' are identical? ;-)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Right :-)
Oh well, at least I got a chance emphasizing again that the Cisco side
was being silly with its Group 1 :-)
Jacco
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>