<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Hi everyone,<br>
<br>
Just thought I would report back that after Paul suggestion to use
2.6.18.1 I have successfully patch with both NAT-T and KLIPS and
rebuilt without issue.<br>
<br>
Thanks to everyone for your help.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
Toby<br>
</font><br>
<br>
Paul Wouters wrote:
<blockquote
cite="midPine.LNX.4.64.0703052032350.31981@tla.xelerance.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, tleslie wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">i will probably look at modifying the patches in the next week or so as
i need it working on 2.6.20.+
when i looked at the barf on the patch, it look like subtle differences,
so I am assuming it will not be a hard fix.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
It is not. However, when deploying the nat-t patch when fixed manually, you
will oops your kernel when ESPinUDP encapsulation actually takes place.
That's why we haven't released 2.4.8 yet. Patches are very welcome.
Paul
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>