<div>Yes,both ends are openswan 2.4.0 klips+kernel 2.6.13.2(LFS)</div>
<div>I ever replaced gw2 with a linux based broad band vpn router , it's OK.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/27/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Paul Wouters</b> <<a href="mailto:paul@xelerance.com">paul@xelerance.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Delta Yeh wrote:<br><br>> Subject: [Openswan Users] klips openswan2.4.0 +kernel <a href="http://2.6.13.2"></b></font><font color="red"><b>MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "2.6.13.2" claiming to be</b></font> <font color="red"><b>MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:
2.6.13.2</a> nat-t failed<br><br>> Oct 26 11:03:15 firewall pluto[21786]: "sh_bj" #1: message ignored<br>> because it contains an unknown or unexpected payload type<br>> (ISAKMP_NEXT_NAT-D) at the outermost level
<br><br>There are some known nat-t problems. Some of them have been resolved and<br>you can try a developer release (2.4.2dr5 is the latest available right now).<br><br>I would be interested to know if your problem then goes away.
<br><br>Is this openswan to openswan?<br><br>Paul<br></blockquote></div><br>