[Openswan Users] Re: 2 NICs(in a single host) to 1 NIC ipsec tenneling concurrently

[Michael Richardson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Nate" == Nate Carlson <natecars at natecarlson.com> writes:
    Nate> On Fri, 14 May 2004, yi min wrote:
    >> I hope to connect from VPN Box A" to VPN Box B" with using two ipsec
    >> tunnels concurrently.
    >> 
    >> but In spite of configuring as below structure and ipsec configurations,
    >> unfortunately I can not success
    >> 
    >> if i try to connect GRE connection, first of all i think to be able to
    >> use GRE after successing in IPsec Tunneling
    >> 
    >> I wanna know about the methods of dual(redundant)ipsec tunnels from each
    >> others 2 NIC of a VPN Box A" to a same destination NIC of VPN Box B"
    >> 
    >> 10.0.1.0/24===1.2.3.4---3.4.5.6...x.x.x.x---x.x.x.y ===10.0.0.0/24
    >> 10.0.1.0/24===2.3.4.5---2.3.4.10...x.x.x.x---x.x.x.y ===10.0.0.0/24

    Nate> As far as I know, it's not currently possible to have two
    Nate> tunnels up to 

  That is correct.
  I'd love to be able to fix it to load balance, but that needs a
session layer keep-alive to be defined.

- --
]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at xelerance.com      http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBQKUVLYqHRg3pndX9AQH0DAP8DYHmQe67uvy11IIHDOye+sYOAiuXKL/0
Px8nH+xjDXKmniJ7Jl23kaYa8eewIGr7I19ypbX8whibFNGjI1TkbH2lOLHtYtkY
Tf6OjNaBUATd1t+FteU2nHhrj2g88pA+3jRCQ9v2wqhcxO0YvyiqZH4KJ9kGxIfe
mASxFXjNcf0=
=OBlH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----